holding that a plaintiff must establish the same three elements to succeed on a claim for retaliation under M.G.L. c. 151B
Summary of this case from Brader v. Biogen Inc.No. 91-1528.
June 15, 1992.
C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 950 F. 2d 816.
holding that a plaintiff must establish the same three elements to succeed on a claim for retaliation under M.G.L. c. 151B
Summary of this case from Brader v. Biogen Inc.holding that punitive damages are nondischargeable under § 523
Summary of this case from In re Albarranholding punitive damages assessed for fraud dischargeable pursuant to subsection, but distinguishing punitive damages assessed for willful and malicious injury pursuant to subsection as nondischargeable
Summary of this case from In re Daghighfekraffirming grant of summary judgment where alleged retaliation occurred over two years after protected activity
Summary of this case from COAKLEY v. AGAR SUPPLY COMPANY, Nostating that "[t]his requirement has sharp teeth" because "[the nonmoving party] `must present definite, competent evidence to rebut the motion'"
Summary of this case from Massachusetts Institute of Technology v. Harman International Industries, Inc.explaining that "[g]enuine issues of material fact are not the stuff of an opposing party's dreams"
Summary of this case from Bransford Petz, P.C. v. Bank of Am. Commercial Fin. Corp.characterizing nine months as "a long gestation period" and finding no causal connection
Summary of this case from Mullenix v. Forsyth Dental Infirmaryexplaining elements of retaliation charge under the ADEA
Summary of this case from Braverman v. Penobscot Shoe Co.Full title:MESNICK v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 15, 1992
Although contingent fee contracts do not become part of a bankruptcy estate, fees earned under such contracts…
U.S. v. SageThere are several factors courts consider in determining responsibility, including (1) the individual's…