From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendoza v. City of Miami

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Sep 6, 1973
483 F.2d 430 (5th Cir. 1973)

Opinion

No. 73-1672. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

August 14, 1973. Rehearing Denied September 6, 1973.

Alan H. Rothstein, City Atty., S. R. Sterbenz, Asst. City Atty., Miami, Fla., for defendant-appellants-cross-appellees.

Luis P. Salas, Miami, Fla., Russell E. Carlisle, Kenneth F. Tworoger, Fort Lauderdale, for plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Before THORNBERRY, GOLDBERG and RONEY, Circuit Judges.



These are cross-appeals from a summary judgment entered against the Mayor, the City Manager, and the Chairman of the Civil Service Board of the City of Miami, Florida, in a suit brought by the appellee, an alien, concerning discrimination against aliens in the City's employment practices. We affirm.

1. The Court correctly held the civil service rule excluding aliens from employment to be unconstitutional. Sugarman v. Douglass, 413 U.S. 634, 93 S.Ct. 2842, 37 L.Ed.2d 853 (1973). The unconstitutionality of excluding aliens being the only issue in the case, the District Court's order striking Rule V, Section 3 of the City of Miami Civil Service Rules and Regulations must be construed to affect only the clause pertaining to citizenship.

2. There was no abuse of discretion by the trial judge in finding that $2,800 was sufficient compensation to be awarded the cross-appellants' attorneys, which amount was supported by the affidavits introduced into evidence.

3. The City of Miami and the City of Miami Civil Service Board were properly dismissed from the suit due to improper service of process: wives are not authorized to receive service for the respective chief executive officers in their official capacities. F.R.Civ.P. 4(d)(6); F.S.A. §§ 48.111 and 120.071.

4. The cause is remanded to the District Court for consideration of an award of attorney's fees for the prosecution of this appeal.

Affirmed and remanded for consideration of attorney's fees.


Summaries of

Mendoza v. City of Miami

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Sep 6, 1973
483 F.2d 430 (5th Cir. 1973)
Case details for

Mendoza v. City of Miami

Case Details

Full title:MARIA F. G. MENDOZA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHER PERSONS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Sep 6, 1973

Citations

483 F.2d 430 (5th Cir. 1973)

Citing Cases

Norman v. Housing Auth., City of Montgomery

It is perfectly proper to award attorney's fees based solely on affidavits in the record. Mesa Petroleum…

Mesa Petroleum Co. v. Coniglio

We perceive no error in the use of affidavits for such a purpose. See, e. g., Mendoza v. City of Miami, 483…