From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Melendez v. McEwen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 31, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2895 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2895 MCE EFB P

07-31-2012

ANGELO MELENDEZ, Petitioner, v. LELAND SCOTT McEWEN, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings "if the interests of justice so require." See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings.

Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner's July 23, 2012 request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.

____________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Melendez v. McEwen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 31, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2895 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Melendez v. McEwen

Case Details

Full title:ANGELO MELENDEZ, Petitioner, v. LELAND SCOTT McEWEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 31, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2895 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2012)