Medina v. Rodors

Full title: ERNEST MEDINA, Plaintiff, v. RODORS, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 12, 2012

No. 2:12-cv-1773 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-1773 DAD P

07-12-2012

ERNEST MEDINA, Plaintiff, v. RODORS, et al., Defendants.

DALE A. DROZD

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The alleged violations took place in Kern County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court

Eastern District of California

2500 Tulare Street

Fresno, CA 93721

_________________________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DAD:mp
medi1773.22