holding that "the availability of Parratt-type postdeprivation remedies is irrelevant" to claim where money was allegedly taken from a prisoner account "pursuant to established policies"
Summary of this case from Cannon v. HullNos. 97-6449, 97-6634.
July 1, 1998.
Affirmed in No. 97-6449; Vacated in No. 97-6634.
W.D.Va., 993 F.Supp. 389, 993 F.Supp. 413
holding that "the availability of Parratt-type postdeprivation remedies is irrelevant" to claim where money was allegedly taken from a prisoner account "pursuant to established policies"
Summary of this case from Cannon v. Hullholding the district court did not err by dismissing opt-in plaintiffs' claims which exceeded the limitations period when no consents were filed within the applicable three-year period
Summary of this case from QUINTANILLA v. AR DEMOLITION, INC.affirming dismissal of six named plaintiffs, stating: "Redundant though it may seem to require consents from the named plaintiffs," an FLSA collective action "renders consents necessary."
Summary of this case from LaFleur v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.observing that “Shamblin and its progeny deal with situations where the insured sought recovery for an excess verdict that the insurer declined to pay ”
Summary of this case from Bailey v. BradfordFull title:McGlothlin v. Murray; Ameen v. Murray
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Date published: Jul 1, 1998
In its entirety, it reads, "As an employee of a private ministry, Chaplain Morse is not a 'state actor'…
Watson v. Travis Software Corp.See Pivonka v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Johnson County, Kansas, No. 04-2598, 2005 WL 1799208, at *1 n. 1 (D.…