From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGinnis v. Atkinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
Case No. 1:11-cv-01337 LJO JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-01337 LJO JLT (PC)

01-18-2012

RAYMOND MCGINNIS, Plaintiff, v. B. ATKINSON, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR DEPOSITIONS TAKEN VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE


(Doc. 19)

On January 13, 2012, Defendants requested, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), to be allowed to conduct the deposition of Plaintiff and other witnesses via video conference. Defendants explain that Plaintiff is housed approximately 250 miles away from their location.

Good cause appearing, Defendants' January 13, 2012, request to take depositions via video conferencing (Doc. 19) is GRANTED. However, nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is housed to obtain video conferencing equipment if it is not already available.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

McGinnis v. Atkinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
Case No. 1:11-cv-01337 LJO JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)
Case details for

McGinnis v. Atkinson

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND MCGINNIS, Plaintiff, v. B. ATKINSON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cv-01337 LJO JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)