From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDaniel v. Hubbard

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 3, 2008
No. 2:07cv1189-JAM-JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2008)

Opinion

No. 2:07cv1189-JAM-JFM (PC).

November 3, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On July 30, 2008, plaintiff renewed his motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff again failed to provide a proposed second amended complaint. See July 21, 2008 Order. In addition, plaintiff seeks leave to add a new claim and new defendants; as defendants note, plaintiff did not exhaust his administrative remedies with regard to that new claim. (Opp'n at 4.) Moreover, the 1991 deaths of inmates at CMF are not relevant to plaintiff's claims, and allowing plaintiff to amend at this late date, after discovery and pretrial motions filing deadlines have run would unduly delay this action. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend must therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's July 30, 2008 motion for leave to amend [docket no. 48] is denied.

2. Plaintiff's pretrial statement is due November 14, 2008. (See February 25, 2008 Revised Scheduling Order.)


Summaries of

McDaniel v. Hubbard

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 3, 2008
No. 2:07cv1189-JAM-JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2008)
Case details for

McDaniel v. Hubbard

Case Details

Full title:CLIFTON JEROME McDANIEL, Plaintiff, v. S. HUBBARD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 3, 2008

Citations

No. 2:07cv1189-JAM-JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2008)