From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Frederick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 1956
1 A.D.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Opinion

February 24, 1956


Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a subpoena which had been issued by respondent requiring appellant to appear as a witness in an investigation conducted by respondent pursuant to section 11 Exec. of the Executive Law. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Section 11 Exec. of the Executive Law was enacted by section 1 of chapter 887 of the Laws of 1953. Section 2 of the said chapter appropriated a sum of money and made the same available "to the executive department for the expenses * * * of the office of the commissioner of investigation, in carrying out the provisions of this act." Designation of the number "11" to the section necessarily placed the section amongst the sections of the Executive Law which deal with the office of the Governor and the Executive Department (arts. 2, 3), and the Governor is head of the Executive Department (N.Y. Const., art. V, § 4). The fact that the appropriation was not made to the commissioner and the fact that the section was placed amongst those dealing with the Executive Department sufficiently demonstrate that the office of the commissioner is not a new civil department, but only part of the Executive Department, and that therefore the section did not violate the prohibition in section 3 of article V of the State Constitution against creation of new departments. In our opinion, the commissioner is not limited to examining witnesses in the county in which they reside or have a place of business, or in which the transactions being investigated took place. Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Frederick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 1956
1 A.D.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)
Case details for

Matter of Frederick

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CADMAN H. FREDERICK, Appellant. J. IRWIN SHAPIRO, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 24, 1956

Citations

1 A.D.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Citing Cases

Matter of Ryan v. Temporary State Commission

We do not construe the language objected to as permissive of a general substantial deviation from the…

Corning v. Curran

nt by requiring the attendance of a number of police officers at hearings before the Commission in New York…