From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matrunich v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 18, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1424-CMK (E.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1424-CMK.

February 18, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Pursuant to the court's scheduling order, plaintiff is required to prosecute this action by either seeking voluntary remand or filing a dispositive motion within 45 days from the date of service of the administrative record by defendant. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. A review of the docket reflects that the answer and certified administrative record were served on November 16, 2009, and November 19, 2009, respectively. To date, plaintiff has not filed a dispositive motion.

Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file a dispositive motion. Plaintiff is again warned that failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of the action for the reasons outlined above, as well as for failure to prosecute and comply with court rules and orders. See id.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Matrunich v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 18, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1424-CMK (E.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2010)
Case details for

Matrunich v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:NINA MATRUNICH, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 18, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1424-CMK (E.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2010)