From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Riser

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 9, 2022
CV 22-5146 PA (KSx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2022)

Opinion

CV 22-5146 PA (KSx)

09-09-2022

Jessica B Martinez v. Andrea Cecilia Riser, et al.


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution

Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1).

In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before September 19, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed, as to Harbor Property Management, for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Riser

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 9, 2022
CV 22-5146 PA (KSx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Martinez v. Riser

Case Details

Full title:Jessica B Martinez v. Andrea Cecilia Riser, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 9, 2022

Citations

CV 22-5146 PA (KSx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2022)