From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Town of Paradise

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 11, 2016
No. 2:15-cv-0594 JAM AC (PS) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-0594 JAM AC (PS)

04-11-2016

RICHARD S. MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF PARADISE, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On February 19, 2016, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 25. Plaintiff has not responded to the court's order, nor taken any action to prosecute this case.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. R. 110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one (21) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file //// objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: April 11, 2016

/s/_________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Martin v. Town of Paradise

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 11, 2016
No. 2:15-cv-0594 JAM AC (PS) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2016)
Case details for

Martin v. Town of Paradise

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD S. MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF PARADISE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 11, 2016

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-0594 JAM AC (PS) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2016)