holding that where the appellant specifies a judgment or a part thereof, appellate court "has no jurisdiction to review other judgments or issues which are not expressly referred to and which are not impliedly intended for appeal."
Summary of this case from Swisher International, Inc. v. U.S.No. 81-874.
December 14, 1981.
C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 642 F. 2d 845 and 651 F. 2d 1016.
holding that where the appellant specifies a judgment or a part thereof, appellate court "has no jurisdiction to review other judgments or issues which are not expressly referred to and which are not impliedly intended for appeal."
Summary of this case from Swisher International, Inc. v. U.S.reviewing district court's ruling to substitute a juror with an alternate for abuse of discretion
Summary of this case from State v. DavisFull title:MARATHON OIL CO. ET AL. v. MALCOLM, FORMERLY DBA SPAR OIL CO. ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Dec 14, 1981
Such a substitution would be based on the theory that the petitioner's job at Danville gave her the identical…
U.S. Philips Corp. v. Windmere Corp.In the Eleventh Circuit, "[t]o avoid a directed verdict, [Windmere] must have presented sufficient evidence…