From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mar. Asset Mgmt., LLC v. NeurogesX, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 25, 2013
Case No.: 12-CV-5034 YGR (N.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 12-CV-5034 YGR

04-25-2013

MARITIME ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. NEUROGESX, INC., ANTHONY A. DITONNO, STEPHEN F. GHIGLIERI, AND JEFFREY TOBIAS, M.D., Defendants.


ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

The pending motions to dismiss raise the issue of whether the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act ("SLUSA") precludes Plaintiff's class claims under state law. 15 U.S.C. § 78bb(f)(1). As discussed at the hearing on these motions, there appears to be an ambiguity in the language of Section 78bb(f)(5)(B), the definition of the term "covered class action."

The Court seeks further briefing as to the statutory construction of this provision, including but not limited to any legislative history, additional case authorities, and secondary sources which elucidate the meaning of the term.

Defendants shall file a joint supplemental brief of no more than five pages by May 9, 2013. Plaintiff shall file its responsive supplemental brief of no more than five pages by May 23, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mar. Asset Mgmt., LLC v. NeurogesX, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 25, 2013
Case No.: 12-CV-5034 YGR (N.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Mar. Asset Mgmt., LLC v. NeurogesX, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARITIME ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. NEUROGESX, INC., ANTHONY A…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 25, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 12-CV-5034 YGR (N.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2013)