From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manuel v. Higgins

United States District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky
Sep 19, 2023
CIVIL 5:20-CV-127-KKC-MAS (E.D. Ky. Sep. 19, 2023)

Opinion

CIVIL 5:20-CV-127-KKC-MAS

09-19-2023

SHAUNTRELL MANUEL, Plaintiff, v. EMT-P ANTHONY HIGGINS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KAREN K. CALDWELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, or, in the alternative, a Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 54) and the magistrate judge's recommendation that the motion be granted (DE 66).

Manuel brought a Bivens claim and a Federal Tort Claims Act claim against Defendants. The magistrate found that the Bivens claim is barred as untimely, and the Federal Torts Claims Act claim lacks relevant expert proof. Accordingly, the magistrate judge has recommended that the Court approve Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the recommendation. Further, the Court has reviewed the recommendation and agrees with its analysis.

Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:

1) the Report and Recommendation (DE 66) is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion;

2) Defendants motion for summary judgment (DE 54) is GRANTED; and

3) a judgment consistent with this order and the Report and Recommendation will be entered.


Summaries of

Manuel v. Higgins

United States District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky
Sep 19, 2023
CIVIL 5:20-CV-127-KKC-MAS (E.D. Ky. Sep. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Manuel v. Higgins

Case Details

Full title:SHAUNTRELL MANUEL, Plaintiff, v. EMT-P ANTHONY HIGGINS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky

Date published: Sep 19, 2023

Citations

CIVIL 5:20-CV-127-KKC-MAS (E.D. Ky. Sep. 19, 2023)

Citing Cases

Brackett v. Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC

Because of the multiple potential causes for tinnitus and allergies, causation is outside the bounds of…