From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mahone v. Pierce County

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Aug 1, 2011
No. C10-5847 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. C10-5847 RBL/KLS.

August 1, 2011


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #'s 50, 59], and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.
(2) Defendant Charla James' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED; Plaintiff's federal claims against Defendant James are Dismissed with Prejudice; Plaintiff's state law claims are Dismissed Without Prejudice.
(3) All pending motions are DENIED as MOOT. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment for the Defendant.
(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendants and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.


Summaries of

Mahone v. Pierce County

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Aug 1, 2011
No. C10-5847 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Mahone v. Pierce County

Case Details

Full title:SYLVESTER JAMES MAHONE, Plaintiff, v. PIERCE COUNTY, PIERCE COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Aug 1, 2011

Citations

No. C10-5847 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 1, 2011)

Citing Cases

Perfetto v. Plumpton

These courts reason that, as with Section 1983 claims, a county or municipality cannot be liable for a RLUIPA…