From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maddox v. J.C. Penney Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Sep 25, 2012
Case No. 2:11-CV-02353-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CV-02353-JAM-DAD

09-25-2012

SOPHIE A. MADDOX, PHYLLIS DANOS, JOANN WETHERN, IDA LOCKE-REESE, THERESA K. SCHMART and SHARLEEN HESLA, Plaintiffs, v. J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC., J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC., a business entity, and DOES ONE through FIFTY, inclusive, Defendants.

REX DARRELL BERRY, State Bar No. 110219 BERRY & BLOCK LLP CATHERINE C. KAYS (TX State Bar No. 04384300) Admitted Pro Hac Vice J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC. Attorneys for Defendant J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC. THERESE LAWLESS, State Bar No. 127341 LISA P. MAK, State Bar No. 260281 LAWLESS & LAWLESS Attorneys for Plaintiffs SOPHIE A. MADDOX, PHYLLIS DANOS, JOANN WETHERN, IDA LOCKE-REESE, THERESA K. SCHMART and SHARLEEN HESLA


REX DARRELL BERRY, State Bar No. 110219
BERRY & BLOCK LLP
CATHERINE C. KAYS (TX State Bar No. 04384300)
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC.
Attorneys for Defendant
J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC.
THERESE LAWLESS, State Bar No. 127341
LISA P. MAK, State Bar No. 260281
LAWLESS & LAWLESS
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SOPHIE A. MADDOX, PHYLLIS DANOS, JOANN WETHERN, IDA LOCKE-REESE,
THERESA K. SCHMART and SHARLEEN HESLA

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE HEARING DATE AND

OPPOSITION/REPLY DATES FOR

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT


[Motion currently set for October 17,

2012]

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record that:

1. The current hearing date of October 17, 2012 set for Defendant J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC.'s pending motion for summary judgment shall be continued from October 17, 2012 to November 7, 2012 at 9:30 a.m.

2. The dates by which the parties must file their respective opposition and reply papers to the motion shall be based on the new hearing date of November 7, 2012.

BERRY & BLOCK LLP

By ______________________

REX DARRELL BERRY

Attorneys for Defendant

J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC.

LAWLESS & LAWLESS

By ______________________

LISA P. MAK

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the current hearing date of October 17, 2012 for Defendant J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC.'s pending motion for summary judgment shall be continued to November 7, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. The filing dates for the parties' respective opposition and reply papers shall be based on the new hearing date of November 7, 2012. IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Maddox v. J.C. Penney Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Sep 25, 2012
Case No. 2:11-CV-02353-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Maddox v. J.C. Penney Co.

Case Details

Full title:SOPHIE A. MADDOX, PHYLLIS DANOS, JOANN WETHERN, IDA LOCKE-REESE, THERESA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Sep 25, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CV-02353-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2012)