From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lujan v. Chase Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 10, 2012
No. CIV S-12-0007 MCE CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-12-0007 MCE CKD PS

01-10-2012

MICHAEL LUJAN, Plaintiff, v. CHASE BANK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The complaint filed by plaintiff alleges a variety of state law claims. Plaintiff also alleges his "civil constitutional rights" were violated. However, defendants do not appear to be state actors and therefore a claim under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, cannot lie.

The federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. In the absence of a basis for federal jurisdiction, plaintiff's claims cannot proceed in this venue. There is no basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction evident in the complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than January 30, 2012, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

___________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4 lujan.nosmj.osc


Summaries of

Lujan v. Chase Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 10, 2012
No. CIV S-12-0007 MCE CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Lujan v. Chase Bank

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL LUJAN, Plaintiff, v. CHASE BANK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 10, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-12-0007 MCE CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2012)