From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lowe v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 14, 1982
420 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Summary

holding newly purchased vehicle not covered where insured did not notify insurer of purchase within notice period required by policy

Summary of this case from Birmingham Fire Ins. Co. v. Rosado

Opinion

No. 81-1210.

September 8, 1982. Rehearing Denied October 14, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Volusia County, J. Robert Durden, J.

Michael L. Ramos, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Joe G. Dykes, Jr., of Landis, Graham, French, Husfeld, Sherman Ford, P.A., DeLand, for appellee.


Appellant Lowe appeals from a summary final judgment in favor of appellee State Farm, in a dispute arising out of Lowe's claim for personal injury protection benefits. We affirm.

Lowe, a Florida resident, was insured by State Farm for the period May 19, 1980, to November 19, 1980. The insured vehicle was a 1972 BMW. On September 17, 1980, Lowe was involved in an accident in Ohio, while driving a 1971 Volkswagen which he had purchased five days earlier. He had not notified State Farm of the additional vehicle, nor in fact, did he notify State Farm of the accident until February 13, 1981.

State Farm contended below that Lowe was not covered while operating his Volkswagen because it was not insured under the policy. Lowe contends that it was covered and that there is no showing of prejudice to State Farm because of the lack of notice.

The policy provision which controls here says, in pertinent part:

"If there is other no-fault coverage or if you own more than one vehicle:

1. Vehicles you own.

a. If the vehicle involved in the accident is owned by you or your spouse, this coverage applies only if it is:

(1) Your car [defined elsewhere in the policy as the automobile listed on the declarations page, in this case the BMW]; or

(2) A newly acquired car.

The policy provides that "a newly acquired car":
Means a car newly owned by you or your spouse if it:
1. Replaces your car; or
2. Is an added car and we insure all other cars owned by you and your spouse on the date of its delivery to you or your spouse;
but only if you or your spouse:
1. Tell us about it within 30 days after its delivery to you or your spouse; and
2. If you or your spouse has more than one of our car policies, tell us which one to apply; and
3. Pay us any added premium due.

The policy did not list the Volkswagen as the insured vehicle, so it was excluded from coverage under the definition of "your car." Neither could it qualify as a "newly acquired car", because the insured never notified the insurer of the acquisition of the car during the policy period, let alone the 30-day period after acquisition required by the policy. See Pennsylvania Threshermen Farmers Mutual Casualty Insurance Company v. Traister, 173 So.2d 153 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965).

The summary final judgment is

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and SHARP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lowe v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 14, 1982
420 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

holding newly purchased vehicle not covered where insured did not notify insurer of purchase within notice period required by policy

Summary of this case from Birmingham Fire Ins. Co. v. Rosado
Case details for

Lowe v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN A. LOWE, III, APPELLANT, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Oct 14, 1982

Citations

420 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. v. Baker

However, neither Garrote v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 496 F.2d 1168 (5th Cir. 1974), nor Johnson v.…

Rabatie v. U.S. Sec. Ins. Co.

We reach this result because the plaintiff/insured failed to notify the defendant/insurer that the former had…