From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lofton v. Adkins

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Aug 26, 2011
Case Number: 1:10cv863 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 26, 2011)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:10cv863.

August 26, 2011


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on August 2, 2011 (Doc. 41), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired August 19, 2011, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for default judgment against the original defendants (Doc. 6) and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment against the original defendants (Doc. 7) are DENIED.

The motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Bear, Comer, Jenkins and Reeder (Doc. 19) is GRANTED. The claims asserted in the first complaint against these defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice.

Defendants Mahlman, Parks and Adkins' motions to dismiss the second complaint (Docs. 20, 24, and 25) are GRANTED. All claims asserted against these defendants in the consolidated action are DISMISSED with prejudice.

The Court will certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1997).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lofton v. Adkins

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Aug 26, 2011
Case Number: 1:10cv863 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Lofton v. Adkins

Case Details

Full title:Harrison Lofton, Plaintiff(s), v. Charles Adkins, et al., Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Aug 26, 2011

Citations

Case Number: 1:10cv863 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 26, 2011)