From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Link v. Michigan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 6, 2012
Case No. 1:12-CV-52 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-CV-52

03-06-2012

FLORENCE LINK and RICHARD LINK, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al., Defendants.


Honorable Robert Holmes Bell


ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING

MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On February 14, 2012, Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Dkt. No. 13) recommending that Plaintiffs' complaint be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, or, in the alternative, that it be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) because it seeks relief against defendants entitled to immunity and fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. No objections have been filed, and the deadline for doing so has expired. The Court has reviewed the matter and concludes that the R&R correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's February 14, 2012, R&R (Dkt. No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

______________

ROBERT HOLMES BELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Link v. Michigan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 6, 2012
Case No. 1:12-CV-52 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Link v. Michigan

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE LINK and RICHARD LINK, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 6, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:12-CV-52 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 6, 2012)