From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Las Vegas Paving Corp. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 5, 2017
No. 72720 (Nev. App. Apr. 5, 2017)

Opinion

No. 72720

04-05-2017

LAS VEGAS PAVING CORPORATION, A NEVADA CORPORATION; AND BRADLEY SCHNEIDER, Petitioners, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH GOFF GONZALEZ, DISTRICT JUDGE; AND THE HONORABLE NANCY L. ALLF, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and JAMAR COLEMAN, Real Party in Interest.


ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenging a district court order denying a motion to disqualify District Court Judge Nancy L. Allf from presiding over the underlying case.

A writ of mandamus is available to compel the performance of an act that the law requires as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station or to control an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion. See NRS 34.160; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008). This court may issue a writ of prohibition to arrest the proceedings of a district court exercising its judicial functions when such proceedings are in excess of the district court's jurisdiction. See NRS 34.320; Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). Whether to consider a writ petition is within this court's discretion. Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. And petitioners bear the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Having considered the petition and appendix, we conclude that petitioners have not met their burden of demonstrating that extraordinary writ relief is warranted. See id. Accordingly, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851.

In light of our denial of this petition, we deny as moot petitioners' April 3, 2017, emergency motion for a stay of the underlying proceedings. --------

It is so ORDERED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge

Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas

Emerson Law Group

Marshall Law Office

Eglet Prince

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Las Vegas Paving Corp. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 5, 2017
No. 72720 (Nev. App. Apr. 5, 2017)
Case details for

Las Vegas Paving Corp. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Case Details

Full title:LAS VEGAS PAVING CORPORATION, A NEVADA CORPORATION; AND BRADLEY SCHNEIDER…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 5, 2017

Citations

No. 72720 (Nev. App. Apr. 5, 2017)