From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Langston v. Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 14, 2017
No. 2:16-cv-2359 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2017)

Opinion

No. 2:16-cv-2359 MCE CKD P

03-14-2017

WALTER SHANE LANGSTON, Plaintiff, v. LOPEZ, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On February 15, 2017, the court ordered that plaintiff pay the $400 filing fee for this action within 14 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to pay the filing fee within 14 days would result in dismissal. Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified ///// ///// time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: March 14, 2017

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
lang2359.fnrs


Summaries of

Langston v. Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 14, 2017
No. 2:16-cv-2359 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2017)
Case details for

Langston v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:WALTER SHANE LANGSTON, Plaintiff, v. LOPEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 14, 2017

Citations

No. 2:16-cv-2359 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2017)