finding joinder appropriate where two contemporaneous conspiracies "shared a common purpose" and included "an overlap of participants and acts"
Summary of this case from U.S. v. ShellefNo. 87-876.
March 7, 1988, October TERM, 1987.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 825 F. 2d 1337.
finding joinder appropriate where two contemporaneous conspiracies "shared a common purpose" and included "an overlap of participants and acts"
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Shelleffinding that Section 1983 claims are governed by a one year statute of limitations in Kentucky
Summary of this case from Comer v. McCracken Cnty. Det. Ctr.observing that White grants district courts the discretion to entertain post-judgment fee requests and that in exercising such discretion, the court "should consider unfair surprise or prejudice to the affected party and the policy of avoiding piecemeal appeals."
Summary of this case from Chaney v. Grigg (In re Grigg)stating that "[it] has urged trial courts to avoid defining reasonable doubt unless requested to do so by the jury, because of the risk that the definition will create confusion and impermissibly lessen the required burden of proof"
Summary of this case from State v. PerezFull title:KITCHENS ET AL. v. BOWEN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 7, 1988
We are unpersuaded by the analogy between this situation and the mid-trial voir dire of jurors, which both…
U.S. v. TaylorSecond, appellants maintain that the language stating that there must be a "real possibility" of innocence…