From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 26, 2007
CASE NO. 2:07-cv-471, CRIM. NO. 2:05-cr-196 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 26, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:07-cv-471, CRIM. NO. 2:05-cr-196.

July 26, 2007


OPINION AND ORDER


On June 29, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 be dismissed. Doc. No. 31. Although the parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

King v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 26, 2007
CASE NO. 2:07-cv-471, CRIM. NO. 2:05-cr-196 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 26, 2007)
Case details for

King v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:BRITTNEY T. KING, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jul 26, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 2:07-cv-471, CRIM. NO. 2:05-cr-196 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 26, 2007)

Citing Cases

Shamaly v. Duffey

Petitioner must therefore show that (1) the facts in dispute were false, and (2) the trial court materially…