From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kilpatrick v. Crenshaw Cnty. Comm'n

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Jun 8, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO 2:13cv953-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jun. 8, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO 2:13cv953-MHT (WO)

06-08-2016

JOHN KILPATRICK, Plaintiff, v. CRENSHAW COUNTY COMMISSION and BENJAMIN H. SANDERS, in his individual capacity as County Engineer, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by defendants Crenshaw County Commission and Benjamin H. Sanders (doc. no. 6) is granted, and that this lawsuit is dismissed with prejudice.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff John Kilpatrick, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 8th day of June, 2016.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Kilpatrick v. Crenshaw Cnty. Comm'n

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Jun 8, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO 2:13cv953-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jun. 8, 2016)
Case details for

Kilpatrick v. Crenshaw Cnty. Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:JOHN KILPATRICK, Plaintiff, v. CRENSHAW COUNTY COMMISSION and BENJAMIN H…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 8, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO 2:13cv953-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jun. 8, 2016)