affirming order disqualifying attorney for misconduct during trial, noting that "courts enjoy broad discretion to determine who shall practice before them and to monitor the conduct of those who do"
Summary of this case from Kirkland v. National Mortg. Network, Inc.No. 76-5721.
February 22, 1977, OCTOBER TERM, 1976.
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 47 Ohio St. 2d 94, 351 N. E. 2d 85.
affirming order disqualifying attorney for misconduct during trial, noting that "courts enjoy broad discretion to determine who shall practice before them and to monitor the conduct of those who do"
Summary of this case from Kirkland v. National Mortg. Network, Inc.Full title:KELLEY v. CITY OF CINCINNATI
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 22, 1977
See United States v. Nasser, 476 F.2d 1111 (7th Cir. 1973) (conspiracy to violate a conflict of interest…
United States v. HobsonThe "abuse of discretion" standard is simply too deferential where such a fundamental constitutional right is…