From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keiser v. Lake County Superior Court

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 25, 2008
Case No. C 05 02310 MJJ (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. C 05 02310 MJJ.

January 25, 2008

Clay J. Christianson SBN 143024, Kelly Jackson Christianson, LLP, Santa Rosa, California, Attorneys for Defendant County of Lake.


ORDER GRANTING COUNTY OF LAKES' RULE 41(B) MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE


The Honorable Martin J. Jenkins heard the County of Lake's oral motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on January 14, 2008, the first day of trial. Plaintiff Eva Keiser represented herself. Defendant County of Lake was represented by Clay J. Christianson of Kelly Jackson Christianson, LLP.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

Defendant County of Lake's motion to dismiss with prejudice plaintiff's First Cause of Action for Deprivation of Constitutional Rights and Ninth Cause of Action for Wrongful Termination in Violation of Public Policy for failure to prosecute is hereby Granted. The basis for granting the motion was plaintiff's admission on the record that she was not prepared to proceed with trial as well as the Court's additional findings stated on the record.


Summaries of

Keiser v. Lake County Superior Court

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 25, 2008
Case No. C 05 02310 MJJ (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2008)
Case details for

Keiser v. Lake County Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:EVA M. KEISER, Plaintiff, v. LAKE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, employer and a…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Jan 25, 2008

Citations

Case No. C 05 02310 MJJ (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2008)