From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Byrne

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 15, 2018
No. 73077 (Nev. App. May. 15, 2018)

Opinion

No. 73077

05-15-2018

JEFF JONES, Appellant, v. QUENTIN BYRNE, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Jeff Jones appeals from an order of the district court granting in part and denying in part his petition for a writ of habeas corpus or, in the alternative, writ of mandamus filed on November 24, 2015, and supplement filed on March 14, 2016. Eleventh Judicial District Court, Pershing County; Jim C. Shirley, Judge.

Jones contends the district court erred by denying his claim that the repeated denials of his parole by the Board of Parole Commissioners have violated his rights to procedural due process. Jones has "no protectable liberty interest sufficient to invoke the Due Process Clause." Anselmo v. Bisbee, 133 Nev. ___, ___, 396 P.3d 848, 850 (2017) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Greenholtz v. Inmates of Neb. Penal & Corr. Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 7 (1979) ("There is no constitutional or inherent right of a convicted person to be conditionally released before the expiration of a valid sentence.").

Jones' reliance on Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S 48 (2010), is misplaced. Graham did not announce juveniles had a constitutional liberty interest in release on parole. Rather, it simply held imposing a sentence of life without the possibility of parole on a juvenile, non-homicide offender violates the Eighth Amendment. Graham, 560 U.S. at 74. Jones was not sentenced to life without the possibility of parole, and we note Graham specifically left it to "the State, in the first instance, to explore the means and mechanisms" to ensure juvenile, non-homicide offenders have "some meaningful opportunity to obtain release based on demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation." Id. at 75. Graham thus does not afford Jones relief. We therefore conclude the district court did not err by denying this claim.

Jones also contends the Board considered inapplicable factors in denying his parole. This claim was not raised below, and we decline to consider it on appeal in the first instance. Davis v. State, 107 Nev. 600, 606, 817 P.2d 1169, 1173 (1991), overruled on other grounds by Means v. State, 120 Nev. 1001, 1012-13, 103 P.3d 25, 33 (2004). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. Jim C. Shirley, District Judge

Pershing County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Pershing County Clerk


Summaries of

Jones v. Byrne

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 15, 2018
No. 73077 (Nev. App. May. 15, 2018)
Case details for

Jones v. Byrne

Case Details

Full title:JEFF JONES, Appellant, v. QUENTIN BYRNE, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: May 15, 2018

Citations

No. 73077 (Nev. App. May. 15, 2018)