From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 18, 2010
No. CIV S-07-1826 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1826 MCE KJM P.

November 18, 2010


ORDER


This case settled on April 13, 2010. On September 21, 2010, plaintiff filed a notice that he had not received the agreed-upon amount. Defendants filed an opposition to plaintiff's request to set aside the settlement, noting that the settlement could not be paid until the state adopted the budget. The court does not find that the state's delay in satisfying the settlement justifies setting the agreement aside.

On September 29, 2010, in compliance with this court's order, defendants filed the stipulation of dismissal with prejudice signed by both parties.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion to set aside the settlement agreement (docket no. 66) is denied; and

2. This case is dismissed with prejudice on the parties' stipulation.

DATED: November 18, 2010.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 18, 2010
No. CIV S-07-1826 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2010)
Case details for

Johnson v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE I. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. D.K. SISTO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 18, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1826 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2010)