From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. S & K Partnership

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2012
No. CIV S-11-1321 JAM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1321 JAM CKD PS

01-26-2012

SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. S & K PARTNERSHIP, Defendants.


ORDER

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to timely serve summons. Plaintiff has now responded to that order and filed a proof of service of summons.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The January 4, 2012 order to show cause is discharged.

2. No later than February 29, 2012, the parties shall file a joint status report addressing proposed dates for scheduling in this matter.

____________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. S & K Partnership

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2012
No. CIV S-11-1321 JAM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Johnson v. S & K Partnership

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. S & K PARTNERSHIP, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 26, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1321 JAM CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)