From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. City of Thibodaux

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 27, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2369 SECTION A(2) (E.D. La. Sep. 27, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2369 SECTION A(2)

09-27-2016

JACKALENE ROSA JOHNSON and DAWAN RENE EVERY v. CITY OF THIBODAUX, ET AL.


ORDER AND REASONS

Before the Court is Defendants' Motion in Limine Regarding Medical Issues (Rec. Doc. 124). Plaintiffs oppose Defendants' Motion (Rec. Doc. 133). Trial on this matter is set to begin on October 3, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. For the following reasons, Defendants' Motion in Limine Regarding Medical Issues is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:

I. Calling Medical Providers as Witnesses at Trial

Defendants seek to prohibit Plaintiffs from calling any medical provider as a witness at trial. The Court previously ordered that "[n]o doctor will testify at trial unless opposing counsel receives the doctor's record 30 days before trial, on September 2, 2016." (Rec. Doc. 92, Pg. 2). To the extent that Defendants have received a doctor's records, including Dr. Fadi Abou-Issa and Dr. Deepak Awasthi, on or before September 2, 2016, those doctors may testify at trial. However, their testimony shall be limited to what was included in the medical records available to Defendants. Because the medical records were not produced by Plaintiffs to Defense counsel, Plaintiffs cannot admit those medical records into evidence.

II. Medical Records as Exhibits at Trial

Defendants seek to prohibit Plaintiffs from offering any medical records as exhibits at trial. Plaintiffs never produced copies of the medical records obtained by subpoena to Defendants. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs are prohibited from introducing the medical records obtained through subpoena as exhibits.

III. Eliciting Testimony on Medical Causation from Lay Witnesses

Defendants seek to prohibit Plaintiffs from eliciting testimony on medical causation from lay witnesses at trial. Lay witnesses are prohibited from testifying as to medical causation because they are not experts. Because Plaintiffs are not experts, they are prohibited from opining whether a subsequent surgery was causally related to the accident. Plaintiffs, however, will be allowed to testify as to their injuries received as a result of the accident. Plaintiffs will also be allowed to testify to their treatment, but cannot causally connect any surgery to their accident.

Accordingly;

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion in Limine Regarding Medical Issues (Rec. Doc. 124) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

New Orleans, Louisiana, September 27, 2016.

/s/_________

THE HONORABLE JAY C. ZAINEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. City of Thibodaux

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 27, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2369 SECTION A(2) (E.D. La. Sep. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Johnson v. City of Thibodaux

Case Details

Full title:JACKALENE ROSA JOHNSON and DAWAN RENE EVERY v. CITY OF THIBODAUX, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Sep 27, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2369 SECTION A(2) (E.D. La. Sep. 27, 2016)