From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jasenzak v. Schipp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 1951
278 App. Div. 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

February 13, 1951.


In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, as a result of the negligent repair of a chimney flue, in that it was blocked and caused an accumulation of poisonous gases, order granting respondent's motion to dismiss the complaint as to him, and the judgment entered thereon, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion, under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, denied, without costs. The complaint sufficiently alleges affirmative negligence for which the contractor may be liable, notwithstanding that the injuries were not those of the contractee. ( Brown v. Welsbach Corp., 301 N.Y. 202; Adams v. White Constr. Co., 299 N.Y. 641.) Nolan, P.J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jasenzak v. Schipp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 1951
278 App. Div. 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Jasenzak v. Schipp

Case Details

Full title:JOHN JASENZAK, as Administrator of the Estate of JULIA JASENZAK, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 13, 1951

Citations

278 App. Div. 660 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

Melodee Lane Co. v. Amer. Dist. Tel. Co.

"It is ancient learning that one who assumes to act, even though gratuitously, may thereby become subject to…