From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Iron Workers Dist. Council of S. Ohio & Vicinity Annuity Tr. v. Larry N. Carlin, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Nov 1, 2017
Case No. 3:17cv00165 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 1, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 3:17cv00165

11-01-2017

IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL OF SOUTHERN OHIO & VICINITY ANNUITY TRUST, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LARRY N. CARLIN, INC., et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington

DECISION AND ENTRY

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #18), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations docketed on October 17, 2017 (Doc. #18) is ADOPTED in full; and

2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint and/or Motion to Transfer Venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1404 are DENIED;

November 1, 2017

*s/Thomas M. Rose

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Iron Workers Dist. Council of S. Ohio & Vicinity Annuity Tr. v. Larry N. Carlin, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Nov 1, 2017
Case No. 3:17cv00165 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 1, 2017)
Case details for

Iron Workers Dist. Council of S. Ohio & Vicinity Annuity Tr. v. Larry N. Carlin, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL OF SOUTHERN OHIO & VICINITY ANNUITY TRUST…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Nov 1, 2017

Citations

Case No. 3:17cv00165 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 1, 2017)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Tarter

[Record Nos. 6, 14] Gregory's arguments are nearly identical to Joshua Tarter's arguments, and the Court…

Gantt v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co.

Gantt does not directly address this argument. Venue is proper, and the case could have been brought in the…