From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Pittsburg Wholesale Grocers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 8, 2013
No. C 12-5523 WHA (N.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 12-5523 WHA

04-08-2013

INNOVATION VENTURES, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PITTSBURG WHOLESALE GROCERS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PRO HAC

VICE APPLICATION OF

ATTORNEY ADAM

BLUMENKRANTZ

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Adam Blumenkrantz (Dkt. No. 239) is D ENIED for failing to specify membership in good standing of a specific United States Court or the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia. Merely claiming membership of "the bar of the New York" is insufficient under the civil local rules. While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Pittsburg Wholesale Grocers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 8, 2013
No. C 12-5523 WHA (N.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Pittsburg Wholesale Grocers

Case Details

Full title:INNOVATION VENTURES, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PITTSBURG WHOLESALE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 8, 2013

Citations

No. C 12-5523 WHA (N.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2013)