From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. New Direction Drug Program, Department of Corrections

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jan 26, 2006
Civil No. 05-164-TC (D. Or. Jan. 26, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-164-TC.

January 26, 2006


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on January 11, 2006. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.


Summaries of

Ingram v. New Direction Drug Program, Department of Corrections

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jan 26, 2006
Civil No. 05-164-TC (D. Or. Jan. 26, 2006)
Case details for

Ingram v. New Direction Drug Program, Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:FRANK GLASKER INGRAM, Plaintiff, v. NEW DIRECTION DRUG PROGRAM, DEPARTMENT…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Jan 26, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 05-164-TC (D. Or. Jan. 26, 2006)