From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Wilson

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jun 15, 2012
91 So. 3d 280 (La. 2012)

Opinion

No. 2012–B–1028.

2012-06-15

In re J. Courtney WILSON.


In re Disciplinary Counsel; Wilson, J. Courtney;—Other(s); Applying For Joint Petition for Consent Discipline Pursuant to Rule XIX Sec. 20.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS


PER CURIAM.

[2012-1028 (La. 1]The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent, while representing the plaintiff in a lawsuit, attempted to communicate directly with employees of the represented defendant without the permission of the defendant's attorney. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that John Courtney Wilson, Louisiana Bar Roll number 13561, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed281against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.


Summaries of

In re Wilson

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jun 15, 2012
91 So. 3d 280 (La. 2012)
Case details for

In re Wilson

Case Details

Full title:In re J. Courtney WILSON.

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Jun 15, 2012

Citations

91 So. 3d 280 (La. 2012)

Citing Cases

Melancon v. Conagra Grocery Prods. Co.

• Shah v. Jefferson Par. Sch. Bd., No. 11-2517, 2013 WL 6388635, at *2 (E.D. La. Dec. 6, 2013) (Zainey, J.)…