holding that it was objectively reasonable for an experience border patrol agent to conclude that the stop of a truck was supported by reasonable suspicion
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Zertuche-TobiasNo. 92-1260.
March 22, 1993.
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 64 Ohio St. 3d 657, 597 N. E. 2d 1096.
holding that it was objectively reasonable for an experience border patrol agent to conclude that the stop of a truck was supported by reasonable suspicion
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Zertuche-Tobiasfinding defendants' assertions of disruption were not outweighed by plaintiffs' police officers' speech
Summary of this case from Sexton v. Martingranting summary judgment for a defendant employer in an action to recover benefits "for the additional reason that it is not a proper party"
Summary of this case from Basquez v. East Central Oklahoma Electric Cooperativegranting summary judgment for a defendant employer in an action to recover benefits "for the additional reason that it is not a proper party"
Summary of this case from Niles v. American Airlines, Inc.Full title:HYBUD EQUIPMENT CORP. ET AL. v. SPHERE DRAKE INSURANCE CO., LTD
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 22, 1993
In deciding whether the complaint states a claim, we accept all well-pleaded facts in the complaint as true…
Wayne Mut. Ins. Co. v. MillsOhio courts have consistently held that insurance contracts must be construed in accordance with the same…