Opinion
Argued March 4, 1889
Decided March 19, 1889
Charles E. Patterson for appellant.
E. Countryman for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except PECKHAM, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Huston v. Gilbert
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1889
113 N.Y. 622 (N.Y. 1889)
Summaries of
Huston v. Gilbert
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1889
113 N.Y. 622 (N.Y. 1889)
Case details for
Huston v. Gilbert
Case Details
Full title:BRIDGET HUSTON, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v . EDWARD G…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 19, 1889
Citations
113 N.Y. 622 (N.Y. 1889)
22 N.Y. St. Rptr. 992
Citing Cases
Tisdale v. President, Etc., of D. H.C. Co.
In a case recently before this court the record shows that "while addressing the jury, the counsel for the…