holding that pension fund could not deny benefits to participant on grounds that participant's employer failed to pay required contributions where fund administrator allowed employee to pay contributions himself
Summary of this case from Lees v. Munich Reinsurance Am., Inc.No. 81-308.
October 13, 1981, October TERM, 1981.
C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 637 F. 2d 592.
holding that pension fund could not deny benefits to participant on grounds that participant's employer failed to pay required contributions where fund administrator allowed employee to pay contributions himself
Summary of this case from Lees v. Munich Reinsurance Am., Inc.Full title:HOTEL RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES BARTENDERS INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND ET AL. v…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 13, 1981
As we understand the jurisprudence in this area, where an administrator of a plan decides matters required in…
United States v. LipscombThe cases suggest the broad range of potentially relevant information. See, e.g., Jackson, 627 F.2d at 1210…