From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hood v. Housing Authority of County of Sacramento

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 26, 2006
No. CIV S-06-1534 MCE EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1534 MCE EFB PS.

September 26, 2006


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed August 8, 2006, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. The order warned that failure to file an amended complaint within that time period would result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within ten days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Hood v. Housing Authority of County of Sacramento

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 26, 2006
No. CIV S-06-1534 MCE EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2006)
Case details for

Hood v. Housing Authority of County of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:KATHRYN HOOD, Plaintiff, v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 26, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1534 MCE EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2006)