From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holtsclaw v. Sanders

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Feb 21, 2017
No. 16-3402 (8th Cir. Feb. 21, 2017)

Opinion

No. 16-3402

02-21-2017

Rickey Dale Holtsclaw Plaintiff - Appellant v. Mayor Sandy Sanders, City of Fort Smith, Arkansas; Chief of Police Kevin Lindsey, City of Fort Smith, Arkansas; Mayor Lioneld Jordan, City of Fayetteville, Arkansas; Chief of Police Greg Tabor, City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Defendants - Appellees


Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith [Unpublished] Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Rickey Holtsclaw appeals after the District Court dismissed his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging violations of his right to equal protection of the law under the Fourteenth Amendment. After de novo review, we see no reason to reverse the dismissal order because Holtsclaw failed to state an equal-protection claim. See Phillips v. Norris, 320 F.3d 844, 848 (8th Cir. 2003) (concluding that an equal protection failed where the plaintiff did not allege membership in a protected class or purposeful discrimination). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. --------


Summaries of

Holtsclaw v. Sanders

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Feb 21, 2017
No. 16-3402 (8th Cir. Feb. 21, 2017)
Case details for

Holtsclaw v. Sanders

Case Details

Full title:Rickey Dale Holtsclaw Plaintiff - Appellant v. Mayor Sandy Sanders, City…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Feb 21, 2017

Citations

No. 16-3402 (8th Cir. Feb. 21, 2017)