Hologic, Inc. v. Senorx, Inc.

Full title: HOLOGIC, INC., CYTYC CORPORATION and HOLOGIC L.P., Plaintiffs, v. SENORX…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Apr 11, 2008

CASE NO.: C08-0133 RMW (RS) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO.: C08-0133 RMW (RS).

April 11, 2008

ORDER GRANTING SENORX'S UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION REQUESTING PERMISSION TO FILE REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF SENORX INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO AND MOTION TO STRIKE CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE DECLARATION OF GLENN MAGNUSON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

RONALD WHYTE, District JudgePage 1

The Court, having considered Defendant SenoRx, Inc.'s ("SenoRx") Unopposed Administrative Motion Requesting Permission to File a Reply Brief in Support of Senorx Inc.'s Objections to and Motion to Strike Certain Portions of the Declaration of Glenn Magnuson in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, finds that good cause exists pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5 for the Motion and hereby orders that the Motion is GRANTED in its entirety.

SenoRx's Reply Brief in support of SenoRx Inc.'s Objections to and Motion to Strike Certain Portions of the Declaration of Glenn Magnuson in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction ("SenoRx's Reply"), which was attached as "Attachment A" to SenoRx's Motion is deemed filed. The clerk shall enter SenoRx's Reply on the docket.

It is SO ORDERED