From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holloway v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 19, 2010
No. CIV S-07-0522 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0522 JAM EFB P.

February 19, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 30, 2009, petitioner filed a document styled "Motion to Dismiss Habeas Corpus," seeking to dismiss the case because he was paroled. By an order filed December 7, 2009, the court granted respondent seven days to notify the court whether he objected to petitioner's request for dismissal. On December 10, 2009, counsel for respondent filed a statement of non-opposition and joinder in petitioner's request for dismissal.

An action may be dismissed "by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); See also Rule 12, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. The court finds the parties' filings constitute that stipulation and the Clerk is directed to close the case.


Summaries of

Holloway v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 19, 2010
No. CIV S-07-0522 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Holloway v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE HOLLOWAY, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 19, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0522 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2010)