From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoang v. Bonta

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 22, 2023
2:22-cv-02147-WBS-AC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02147-WBS-AC

02-22-2023

LETRINH HOANG, D.O., PHYSICIANS FOR INFORMED CONSENT, a not-for profit organization, and CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE, CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, a California Nonprofit Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, and ERIKA CALDERON, in her official capacity as Executive Officer of the Osteopathic Medical Board of California “OMBC”, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, it is HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

Defendants' responses to the Complaint will be due thirty (30) days after the date the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the consolidated appeals of McDonald, et al. v. Lawson, et al., Appeal No. 22-56220, and Couris, et al. v. Lawson, et al., Appeal No. 23-55069, issues its mandate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hoang v. Bonta

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 22, 2023
2:22-cv-02147-WBS-AC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2023)
Case details for

Hoang v. Bonta

Case Details

Full title:LETRINH HOANG, D.O., PHYSICIANS FOR INFORMED CONSENT, a not-for profit…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 22, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-02147-WBS-AC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2023)