From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 8, 2017
CASE NO. 1:13-CR-0196 AWI (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:13-CR-0196 AWI Civil Case No. 1:16-CV-0868 AWI

03-08-2017

RICKY LEWIS HILL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER LIFTING STAY AND GRANTING PETITIONER ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO THE DECISION IN BECKLES

This is a petition for relief from sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

On July 7, 2016, the Court stayed this matter until the Ninth Circuit issued opinions in resolution of Gardner v. United States (Appeal No. 15-72559), Jacob v. United States (Appeal No. 15-73302), and United States v. Begay (Appeal No. 14-10080).

The issue in Begay concerns the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). However, this petition does not concern § 924(c), instead it concerns a challenge to the constitutionality of Sentencing Guideline § 4B1.2. Therefore, Begay is not a sufficient basis to keep this matter stayed. Gardner and Jacob both involve challenges to Sentencing Guideline § 4B1.2. In unpublished decisions, the Ninth Circuit remanded those cases to the sentencing courts and did not address the constitutionality of § 4B1.2. Given the remands, no decision from the Ninth Circuit is reasonably forthcoming. However, on March 6, 2017, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Beckles v. United States (Supreme Court No. 15-8544). Beckles held that the advisory Sentencing Guidelines are not subject to vagueness challenges under the Due Process Clause.

Also on March 6, 2017, Petitioner's counsel sent notice to the Court regarding Beckles. See Doc. No. 24. The notice requests that the Court defer ruling on the petition, and asks for 30 days in which to contact petitioner and submit an additional "filing" in light of Beckles. See id.

Given the decision in Beckles, there is no reason to keep the stay in place. The Court will lift the stay and give Petitioner 30 days in which to submit additional briefing/an additional filing in light of Beckles.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The stay in this matter, issued on July 7, 2016, is LIFTED; and 2. Within 30 days of service of this order, Petitioner shall submit additional briefing/an additional filing in light of the Supreme Court's March 6, 2017 decision in Beckles v. United States (Supreme Court No. 15-8544). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 8, 2017

/s/_________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hill v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 8, 2017
CASE NO. 1:13-CR-0196 AWI (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2017)
Case details for

Hill v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RICKY LEWIS HILL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 8, 2017

Citations

CASE NO. 1:13-CR-0196 AWI (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2017)