From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Flagship Credit Assurance

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Aug 13, 2024
Civil Action 3:24-CV-0519-X-BN (N.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:24-CV-0519-X-BN

08-13-2024

LAWRENCE E. HICKS, Plaintiff, v. FLAGSHIP CREDIT ASSURANCE, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

BRANTLEY STARR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. (Doc. No. 7). Magistrate Judge David Horan recommended that the Court dismiss this case without prejudice for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction, or, in the alternative, dismiss this case for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 7 at 2). Plaintiff Lawrence E. Hicks filed an objection. (Doc. 8). The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Hicks's complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (Doc. 1).

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Hicks v. Flagship Credit Assurance

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Aug 13, 2024
Civil Action 3:24-CV-0519-X-BN (N.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Hicks v. Flagship Credit Assurance

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE E. HICKS, Plaintiff, v. FLAGSHIP CREDIT ASSURANCE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Aug 13, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 3:24-CV-0519-X-BN (N.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2024)