From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hedlund v. Miller

U.S.
Feb 22, 1988
484 U.S. 1061 (1988)

Summary

invalidating as hybrid a similar Oregon statute

Summary of this case from Massachusetts Food Ass'n v. Sullivan

Opinion

No. 87-895

February 22, 1988.


Case below, 579 F.Supp. 116; Miller v. Oregon Liquor Control Committee, 688 F.2d 1222; 806 F.2d 940; 813 F.2d 1344.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Denied.


Summaries of

Hedlund v. Miller

U.S.
Feb 22, 1988
484 U.S. 1061 (1988)

invalidating as hybrid a similar Oregon statute

Summary of this case from Massachusetts Food Ass'n v. Sullivan

invalidating comparable regulatory scheme

Summary of this case from Canterbury Liquors Pantry v. Sullivan

videotaping procedure outside of presence of defendant is permissible if there is clear and convincing evidence of a compelling need

Summary of this case from State v. Bullock
Case details for

Hedlund v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:William H. Hedlund, et al., petitioners, v. Elsie Viola Miller, et al

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 22, 1988

Citations

484 U.S. 1061 (1988)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Sargent County Water Resource Dist.

The court previously noted in its Order dated September 20, 1994, that reviewing courts have consistently…

State v. Bonello

GLASS, J. This case presents us with our first opportunity to determine whether this court's decision in…