From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heath v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jan 18, 2013
CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-99-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 18, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-99-DBH

01-18-2013

BRIDGIT L. HEATH, PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DEFENDANT

Represented By Stephen J. O'Donnell Goodspeed & O'Donnell Represented By Matthew J. Del Mastro Veena Reddy Office of General Counsel, Region I Social Security Administration


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On December 30, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Report and Recommended Decision. The time within which to file objections expired on January 16, 2013, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore O RDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby A DOPTED. The decision of the Commissioner is V ACATED and the case is R EMANDED for proceedings not inconsistent with the Recommended Decision.

S O O RDERED.

______________

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Bridgit L. Heath, Plaintiff
v.
Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant
Represented By Stephen J. O'Donnell

Goodspeed & O'Donnell

Represented By Matthew J. Del Mastro

Veena Reddy

Office of General Counsel, Region I

Social Security Administration


Summaries of

Heath v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jan 18, 2013
CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-99-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Heath v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BRIDGIT L. HEATH, PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Jan 18, 2013

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-99-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 18, 2013)