From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawks v. Town of Paradise

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 21, 2023
2:20-CV-00306-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-CV-00306-KJM-DMC

02-21-2023

DIXIANNE HAWKS, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF PARADISE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Eastern District of California local rules.

On December 5, 2022, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. F&R, ECF No. 9. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. Obj., ECF No. 10. Magistrate Judge also “warned that failure to file an amended complaint within the time provided in [the] order may be grounds for dismissal of this action.” Id. at 12. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint and did not explain this lack of filing in her objections. See Obj.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 5, 2022, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.


Summaries of

Hawks v. Town of Paradise

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 21, 2023
2:20-CV-00306-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Hawks v. Town of Paradise

Case Details

Full title:DIXIANNE HAWKS, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF PARADISE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 21, 2023

Citations

2:20-CV-00306-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2023)