From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 26, 2012
CIV-F-08-0617 AWI BAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2012)

Opinion

CIV-F-08-0617 AWI BAM

07-26-2012

ZANE HARDIN, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.; and DOES 1-100, Defendants.


ORDER MOVING SUMMARY

JUDGMENT HEARING DATE TO

AUGUST 27, 2012

Defendant Wal-Mart filed a motion for summary judgment with the hearing date set for July 30, 2012. Plaintiff Zane Hardin made previously made two motions to compel, one of which effectively sought to reopen discovery. In opposition to the summary judgment motion, Plaintiff's briefing stated that additional discovery is warranted, without addressing the merits of disparate impact. The motions to compel have been denied by Magistrate Judge McAuliffe. In order to give Plaintiff a full opportunity to oppose the summary judgment motion on the merits, the hearing for the motion is rescheduled for 1:30 PM on August 27, 2012. Plaintiff's opposition is due at 4:00 PM on August 13, 2012. IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hardin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 26, 2012
CIV-F-08-0617 AWI BAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Hardin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ZANE HARDIN, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.; and DOES 1-100…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 26, 2012

Citations

CIV-F-08-0617 AWI BAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2012)